Response to William Briggs on Psychic Sheep and Goats
What they share across years and disciplines is the grin. Uncharacteristically, you are off base with this essay, which is built on a false premise. Those who believe in psychic phenomena are under no obligation to prove its reality to scientists. That they attempt to do so and cooperate with laboratory ordeals devised by clever rationalists is on them. What isn’t on them is the absurdity of challenging whether or not psychic phenomena and abilities exist and if they are to be taken seriously, must be proven to exist quantitatively in a controlled experiment. Edgar Cayce is all the yes/no proof needed. The anecdotal evidence in support of yes is incredibly vast. Incidents of amazing telepathic links between twins, mothers and children, husbands and wives are too numerous to be counted. But counting is what myopic skeptics are best at. Counting playing card IDs, counting failed attempts at directed psychic performance, and counting poseurs out of the running based on their own narrow, b...